Town note
The name is thought to derive from Staffordshire, England.
about 0:06:36Spoilers are covered until your reading preferences load.
FILE 219 / 15 April 2021 / 151 MIN / full
Stafford, Connecticut, we're going to; Tolland or Tolland county about 0:04:58
The name is thought to derive from Staffordshire, England.
about 0:06:36The town began agriculturally.
about 0:06:43It became part of Tolland County in 1785.
about 0:07:17Water from tributaries of the Willimantic River provided power for industry.
about 0:07:23The name is thought to derive from Staffordshire, England.
about 0:06:36The town began agriculturally.
about 0:06:43It became part of Tolland County in 1785.
about 0:07:17Water from tributaries of the Willimantic River provided power for industry.
about 0:07:23By the mid-1800s Stafford was connected by railroad to other places.
about 0:07:41It also had a trolley connection to other towns.
about 0:07:47During the Civil War its factories made cannon balls and other war supplies for the Union forces.
about 0:07:47The village has the Holt Memorial Foundation.
about 0:08:17In the 18th century the spring at Stafford Springs was said to cure gout, sterility, pulmonary illness and hysterics.
about 0:08:19In 1771 John Adams, then a young lawyer, visited Stafford Springs for several days after suffering from overwork and anxiety.
about 0:09:24Early on the area had iron bogs, and mineral springs drew indigenous peoples.
about 0:10:34Stafford Springs was first a resort town; its popularity declined in the late 1800s.
about 0:10:45Textile mills and a button factory later replaced the spa trade.
about 0:11:1239.8%
Biggest faith: Catholic population, 29%
about 0:21:40White 92% · Black 0.8% · Asian 1.4% · Hispanic 3.9%
Ethnicity can overlap race.Crime overall
▼ about one third
Violent crime
▼ about two-thirds
Three-bedroom two-bath house
about 0:24:07Land lot
about 0:24:37Four-bedroom three-and-a-half-bath house
about 0:25:23"about one third"
Comparison: "under the national average". Direction: below.
As told in 2021 about 0:29:35
"about two-thirds"
Comparison: "under the national average". Direction: below.
As told in 2021 about 0:29:39
"11,901"
No direction stated.
As told in 2021 about 0:19:36
"up 7%"
Comparison: "since 1990". Direction: above.
As told in 2021 about 0:19:40
"51%"
Comparison: "more females than males". No direction stated.
As told in 2021 about 0:20:38
"about 42 and a half"
Comparison: "about five years older than the norm". Direction: above.
As told in 2021 about 0:20:44
"about 48%"
Comparison: "a little less than normal". Direction: below.
As told in 2021 about 0:20:48
"92%"
No direction stated.
As told in 2021 about 0:21:06
"0.8%"
No direction stated.
As told in 2021 about 0:21:06
"1.4%"
No direction stated.
As told in 2021 about 0:21:06
"3.9%"
Comparison: "way less than the 17.5% regular". Direction: below.
As told in 2021 about 0:21:06
"about a quarter"
Comparison: "of all jobs". Direction: below.
As told in 2021 about 0:21:04
"39.8%"
Comparison: "about 40%". No direction stated.
As told in 2021 about 0:21:40
"29%"
No direction stated.
As told in 2021 about 0:21:44
"5%"
No direction stated.
As told in 2021 about 0:21:55
"0.0%"
No direction stated.
As told in 2021 about 0:22:05
"3.6%"
Comparison: "just under the national average". Direction: below.
As told in 2021 about 0:22:30
"$68,813"
Comparison: "normally $57,000". No direction stated.
As told in 2021 about 0:22:40
"99.8"
Comparison: "100 being the regular average". Direction: about the same.
As told in 2021 about 0:23:00
"80 out of 100"
Comparison: "the only low figure". Direction: below.
As told in 2021 about 0:23:13
"$185,700"
No direction stated.
As told in 2021 about 0:23:13
"$1,110 a month"
Comparison: "a little below the national average". Direction: below.
As told in 2021 about 0:23:51
"$219,900"
Comparison: "1,560 square feet on a little over half an acre". Direction: above.
As told in 2021 about 0:24:07
"$107,777"
Comparison: "30.36 acres". No direction stated.
As told in 2021 about 0:24:37
"$544,900"
Comparison: "3,744 square feet on over an acre". Direction: above.
As told in 2021 about 0:25:23
3.0 / 5 · average of 4
“A great small New England town with a solid school system, good public services, water and a government that cares; the reviewer was born and raised there and would never want to leave.”about 0:11:31
“Vandalism and trespassing are a pastime, even the police station had a hole in its window, and drug use is widespread; the lack of activities may be driving young people to drugs and illegal behaviour. The reviewer lives in a rural area near the Massachusetts border, sees an obvious wage gap, and would be cautious but willing about a closer relationship with the townspeople.”about 0:11:51
“Growing up there was not great: there is nothing to do but bonfires in the woods or drugs, anything fun is at least a twenty-minute drive, and the only jobs are at pizza places, Big Y, McDonald's and Dunkin Donuts. New businesses close within two years, two rotaries are being built, the selectmen do nothing, three families run the town, the downtown looks like a dump and the people are narrow-minded and judgmental; the schools are good but the reviewer would never choose to move there.”about 0:14:06
“Lots of problems with defective concrete and foundations; fire beware.”about 0:19:09
In March 2007 Shemiah Smith, a 23-year-old exotic dancer who worked at Kahoots in Vernon, Connecticut under the name Maya, disappeared. She lived with her parents and her boyfriend in East Hartford. He also owned a 75-acre property in Stafford with a trailer and a shooting range. Cell phone records later placed her phone near his Stafford property that day, although he insisted she had never been there.
On 14 March Maya left her parents' house, telling her boyfriend she was going to work and then to meet a client who owned a large parcel of land and drove a black truck. She did not name him. She never arrived at Kahoots and did not come home. Two days later her family reported her missing to the East Hartford police.
He also said she had told him she meant to stay with a female friend. He denied ever taking her to his Stafford property. His account did not fit the evidence. His cell phone records showed him moving around on 16 March, connecting to towers across the area, rather than lying at home. They also placed him near his property on the evening of 14 March and during the following two days.
On 21 March the police went to his house. He asked to be interviewed at the police station so as not to disturb his wife, and before leaving said only, 'It's sad about Maya.' That same day the police learned he owned the 75-acre Stafford parcel. On 23 March they searched it and found an unlocked trailer. A helicopter flyover showed a trailer, two sheds, a fire pit, tractors and tracks in the snow, and the fire pit was clear of the snow that had fallen on 16 March.
Almost at once he raised a moral turpitude clause in his employment contract, saying he could lose a lot of money if his employer's reputation were damaged. He then suggested they move to a more private place and chose the car park of another strip club on the same street. There he got into the police car and directed them around the route he said he had taken with Maya, but he could not find the community college and drove in circles before coming upon it by chance. He repeated that he had never taken her to Stafford. He consented to a search of his truck, where police found ammunition for .40, .357 and .38 calibre guns in a locked safe, and he agreed to a search of his property the next day.
On 8 April cadaver dogs searched the Stafford land. In the fire pit they recovered pieces of human tissue, numerous bone fragments, teeth, part of a human foot, a set of Maya's keys, two .40-calibre shell casings and a .38-calibre hollow-point bullet, plus a third .40 casing elsewhere. At the trailer site they found an empty Cheetos bag, a Clorox ready mop with human blood on the handle and mop head, a six-foot by two-foot piece of carpet with a four-foot by one-foot bloodstain, and a vacuum cleaner bag containing plastic and linoleum with traces of blood.
Michael Carpenter, a family friend, told police that on 14 April he and his father returned a borrowed backhoe and saw the trailer crushed and partly burning. On 19 April Kathleen retained a Manchester attorney recommended by her husband and filed for divorce that day. She filed notices of lis pendens on the marital home at Woodmill Road in Ellington and on the Stafford land.
On 9 May the Smith family began a wrongful death action and obtained a $4.5 million prejudgment remedy. He was carrying more than $10,000 in US and Canadian currency, a newly issued passport, toiletries, pill bottles and medication. His lawyer said he was there to collect a business associate and that the money was for legal fees, but the judge, Raymond Norko, called the crime heinous, set bail at $5 million cash and ordered the case transferred to a court that handled more serious matters.
Forensic work tied the recovered material to Maya. Because no direct sample from her was available, analysts compared DNA from the fire pit and the bloodstained items with her parents' DNA and confirmed that the remains and blood were consistent with their biological daughter. The blood on the mop, plastic and linoleum matched her. The carpet stain could not yield a profile because rain had soaked it, but the shape was consistent with a person lying there. Edward McDonna, the deputy chief medical examiner, said the remains smelled of gasoline, toxicology found nothing but could not rule out drugs because of the heat damage, and the burning made the cause and manner of death impossible to determine. Albert Harper, a forensic anthropologist, said the bones had been burned in a very hot fire approaching commercial cremation, requiring temperatures of 1,500 to 2,000 degrees over many hours, possibly several days, and that the intact skin and muscle on the foot suggested she had been dead about a month. He said a deliberately cremated body indicated someone trying to prevent discovery. Edward Jacomowitz of the State Police Forensics Laboratory testified that the .38 bullet could have come from either the .38 or .357 revolver but was too damaged to say which.
The defence conceded that Maya had bled heavily on the carpet, the linoleum and the mop, but argued there was no proof of intent to kill: the death could have been manslaughter or an accident, the cause of death was unknown, and there was no motive. It pointed to the shooting range on the property and to Robert Malt's testimony that he and his wife had fired revolvers and semi-automatic pistols near the fire pit. It also noted that two cigarette butts found at the trailer site had not been tested for DNA and that no identifiable fingerprints were recovered from the mop handle.
In July 2012 Kathleen asked for the guns back, including the murder weapon, saying she would sell them and put the money in escrow.
The civil case went on. Liability was decided for the Smith family on 30 September, and after a damages hearing in early November the estate was awarded $9,158,233. About $6.8 million was non-economic loss, including nearly $1 million in punitive damages. The judge calculated $10,000 a month for the 57 years Maya might have lived, and $1.3 million in economic damages on the basis that she would have become a hairdresser rather than remaining a dancer.
March 2007 / 75-acre property in Stafford, Connecticut
As told in the episode, on 15 April 2021.
Accused
Public places are marked on the map.
business
about 0:36:31business
about 0:48:45body found
about 1:10:54other
about 1:11:51other
about 1:21:41school
about 0:52:56business
about 0:53:05business
about 1:02:03business
about 1:17:48business
about 1:18:29business
about 1:18:52police
about 0:44:05business
about 0:35:24landmark
about 0:08:19business
about 0:56:24other
about 1:36:56other
about 1:34:04